Fine dining once promised presence – a moment lived only once. What happens when the table becomes performance?
by Ivan Brincat
Painters turn pigment into emotion, composers turn sound into structure, architects shape stone into buildings. Chefs, at their highest level, do the same – transforming raw and great produce through heat and time into experience.
Fine dining, at its best, is not about hunger or habit. It is about feeling.
In popular discourse, fine dining has often been criticised and ridiculed for its minuscule portions — but that misses the point.
A dish can hold an idea, a story, a philosophy. It can give you a sense of time and place. It can make you taste memory. It can move you, the way a poem or a piece of music does.
That is why gastronomy became the last great art form. Because unlike all others, it is alive — it exists only in the moment, and then it’s gone. You cannot hang a meal on a wall. You cannot own it, reproduce it, or replay it. You live it once, and it disappears.
That disappearance — that beautiful impermanence — is what made fine dining sacred.
It is what is now making it fragile.
The Revolution
In the early 2000s, food’s artistic revolution exploded.
Ferran Adrià’s El Bulli wasn’t merely a restaurant; it was a laboratory of imagination. Each dish asked a question: what if food could surprise not through luxury, but through thought? The impact of El Bulli still lingers — you can feel it in every ambitious kitchen today, but particularly in those that emerged in those years.
From there, the movement spread.
René Redzepi made nature itself the medium. Massimo Bottura turned nostalgia into poetry. Niko Romito carved perfection from silence and austerity. Andoni Luis Aduriz at Mugaritz fused philosophy with play.
Grant Achatz in Chicago dissolved the line between emotion and theatre. Daniel Humm redefined simplicity as a new form of opulence. Ana Roš distilled the Slovenian landscape into intuition and tenderness.
Alain Passard elevated vegetables into symphonies of colour and scent. Gaggan Anand experimented with music and non-conformity. Yoshihiro Narisawa and Zaiyu Hasegawa explored ecology, humour, and intimacy, while Virgilio Martínez and Pía León transformed altitude and biodiversity into philosophy.
There were many others, but you get the gist. These artists proved that food could do what great art has always done: express the world through a personal vision — one that can unite, but also divide.
For a time, we lived through food’s Renaissance. The world travelled to eat. Trips were booked only after restaurant reservations were secured. Menus were manifestos of our time — sometimes ahead of it, sometimes echoing broader trends like sustainability or equality. A great meal promised revelation, not comfort.
Fine dining became the most vital cultural movement of its generation — merging craft, philosophy, and theatre in a way that painting or literature could no longer do.
But revolutions are finite. Once every boundary is broken, repetition follows. The 2010s saw gastronomy reach its apex — and perhaps its saturation point. And then the world shifted.
COVID-19 rearranged values. Awards reshuffled themselves. What was once radical became familiar.
The fractured present
By the 2010s, food was not just art; it was philosophy performed every day and at every service. Every plate was a question — about memory, identity, nature, even ethics.
Of course, there were contradictions — loud and clear. How do you reconcile the sustainable restaurant with the diner who has flown halfway around the world for a meal?
But food was the only art that still demanded our full presence — we could not scroll, skip, or replay it. A few bites, maybe even one and it was gone. What was left was memory. That was its magic.
It is now what’s most at risk.
Today, the energy feels different. The dining room, once a stage for revelation, now competes with the with the screen. And just like in daily life, it is looking like a lost battle. A new restaurant today chooses lighting for the camera not the table. And that makes sense. After all, it is today’s culture.
The vocabulary of innovation — local, seasonal, sustainable, narrative — has been repeated so often it no longer resonates. Some chefs are still pushing boundaries, but there is no centre holding them together. There is no single movement that binds them.
We have entered the era of fragmentation — brilliance without cohesion, individuality without revolution.
The art of food was always about presence — about being there, tasting something unrepeatable. The more we try to preserve it, the more we lose what made it alive.
As the old hierarchies lost meaning, a new kind of power began to form — not in the guides, but on the screens in our hands.
The Rise of the Social Table
Power has shifted from the guides to the feed.
Chefs that once built temples of gastronomy now need to build tribes on social media.
The new generation must be fluent in two languages — technique and narrative. They cook for the camera as much as for the guest. A plate must be photogenic before it is profound or tasty. More shallow than depth.
Are we in decline? Not necessarily. This is democratisation. Fine dining stars and social-media chefs now coexist — one cooking for the few, the other performing for the many. Creativity has been decentralised, dispersed across millions of screens. Some chefs today test concepts online before they ever open a restaurant. If it is viral it works, if it generates few likes kill it.
We all raise our phones before our forks – trying to capture a moment that was meant to vanish.
When everyone performs the art, what distinguishes the artist?
Perhaps nothing captures that paradox better than the carbonara phenomenon — every influencer-chef in Italy and beyond making the same silky, camera-ready pasta with the famous cremetta, the cream from the pasta water, for the same scrolling audience.
Carbonara has become the algorithm’s Mona Lisa: endlessly reinterpreted, obsessively replicated, optimised for engagement rather than expression. When every artist paints the same picture, what happens to originality?
What has happened is that we have forgotten what made fine dining so special — why it was the last great art form. And I include myself in this. How often have you found yourself raising your phone before your fork, trying to capture a moment that was meant to vanish? We want to keep the magic, but in doing so, we erase it.
A dish once lived only in our memory; now it lives in pixels — flattened, filtered, forgotten among a thousand other perfect frames. Meals I ate 20 years ago live vividly in my memory. Meals I ate two weeks ago live mainly on my phone. The Photos app has replaced the memory.
What comes next
There was a time when tasting menus felt like passports — entry into another way of thinking about food. They weren’t cheap, but they meant something. A meal at El Bulli, noma, Osteria Francescana or Mugaritz was not dinner; it was participation in culture.
Now, the currency of that meaning has weakened. The tasting menu is everywhere. Every young chef dreams of serving a tasting menu with a narrative. Yet not every restaurant or chef can justify the theatre.
The cost of dining has soared beyond the experience it delivers. Many tasting menus today feel like repetitions — not of ingredients, but of ideas. Caviar is maybe the one unifying factor: throw it on as many dishes as possible to justify the hefty price. The sense of awe and wonder that once justified the cost has thinned. Prices kept creeping up.
Perhaps this is the truest sign of peak food: that we have inflated its value while diluting its purpose.
Not every restaurant needs to be a temple. Not every chef should speak in the language of art. Sometimes the most profound meal costs less, says less, and leaves more unsaid.
Maybe gastronomy has not ended, but matured — from revolution to reflection. Innovation now lies not in spectacle, but in sincerity.
The next frontier won’t be bigger or louder – it will be smaller, more intimate, more real.
The future may belong to chefs who cook for presence not performance — to restaurants that feel human, not heroic; to meals that remind us that art can whisper as well as shout.
If food truly is the last great art form, it will survive not through awards or algorithms, but through those fleeting, unrecorded moments when we taste, and remember, and let it vanish into our memories.
The meal is the art because it does not last.
—
If you’d like to follow along, you can subscribe here for new conversations and field notes.
Leave a Reply